Sometimes a change makes sense, until you remember the details and revisit the use cases.
You Should Blog (Again)
I recently gave the same message to share, but for a different community, at the Amsterdam UX Bar Camp.
| I volunteered to join the other 23 presenters at UXCampAMS! I'm that first paper in the 12:00-12:45 sessions. #MidasRule |
It's Already There...
In recent user research and product feedback I've noticed long-time users of our software suggesting improvements that were already there.
I suspect it's the combination of perhaps three things.
I suspect it's the combination of perhaps three things.
- The way we asked
- The user expectations from knowing the software
- Not wanting to ruin things for others
Ask and You Shall Receive a Response
We've asked, "what would you expect on this screen?" or "would you need this kind of information?"
I'm trying to avoid leading the interviewee, but this kind of question to solicit a response based on the desire to answer. Perhaps the person asked isn't sure or might have a few ideas, but the question itself encourages perhaps a single answer.
Maybe I can leave things more open ended questions and work with our UX researchers on how I can ask better questions.
Midas Rule
As a new customer, I remember asking my first Tridion trainer the difference between an Embedded Schema and a regular Schema ten years ago.
As a new implementer, I remember creating my first Schema(s) and the reaction of my editorial team when they finally had control over their content library a few months later. No more requests to IT to deploy something to Staging to then re-approve on Live!
They eventually explained to me that, "No, we don't publish to Staging. We just publish to Live and fix anything if there's a problem."
As a new consultant, I remember my colleague asking me how I knew all the "best practices." I had four years of experience with the product by then and a few years "managing" content before that.
As a new Product Manager, I remember telling another colleague four years after that, "well, Tridion doesn't work that way." He reminded me that we could change it.
After a decade in the industry and about 13 years in IT, I'm also realizing I'm not so "new" anymore. :-)
Now as a Product Owner for the DX Suite, I'm remembering last week's demo where dozens of UI improvements were implemented in a sprint for the new Graphene User interface (due after Sites 9.1) as well as a "yass!" reaction from an editor to some small, but significant page editing improvements for Tridion Sites 9.
And today I'm letting the Tridion Docs content model slowly sink into my brain after a great session with our lead technical writer.
By the Midas Rule, many of my colleagues and I were not the first to touch this software, nor will we be the last. But we do care enough to be proper stewards of the previous vision, while we work on forging a new one... in Graphene. ;-)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)